Not all knee replacement surgeries are the same. The size and location of the incision can vary, and the surgeon may use different tools and technologies to perform the surgery. The artificial knee components can also vary—for example, components may be standard, gender-specific, custom-made, or composed of non-traditional material(s), such as ceramic.

The goal of knee replacement surgery is to relieve pain and increase function by replacing damaged portions of the joint with prosthetic components. Read Undergoing Total Knee Replacement for Knee Arthritis

Potential variables in knee replacement surgery are discussed in this article. These variables, in addition to the surgeon’s experience and the patient’s overall health and knee anatomy, may affect post-surgical improvements in pain and knee function.

See Questions to Ask Before Knee Replacement

Article continues below
Advertisement

Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement Surgery

The goal of minimally invasive surgery is to preserve more muscle and other soft tissue around the knee, helping facilitate a faster and better recovery. A minimally invasive surgery uses a 3 to 6-inch incision, compared to an 8 to 12-inch incision for a traditional surgery. In addition, the knee cap is typically not disturbed and many soft tissues are pushed aside—rather than cut—to make room for the surgical procedure.

See Traditional Knee Replacement vs. Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement

Minimally invasive knee replacement has become less popular in recent years.1 Less invasive surgical approaches are technically challenging surgeries and carry their own, different set of risks. For example, less invasive surgeries seem to have a higher risk of post-surgical alignment problems2 and nerve damage.3

See The Pros and Cons of Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement Surgery

In This Article:

Computer-assisted Knee Replacement Surgery

Computer-assisted knee replacement surgery is not common in the United States, perhaps because of its cost and the time it adds on to surgery. However, some studies suggest that computer-assisted surgery may provide better implant positioning and better alignment.4 One study comparing nearly 200 surgeries found that people who had computer assisted surgery had better knee function 5 years after surgery.5

Computer assistance may be especially useful for prostheses alignment in patients who are bowlegged.6-8

Patients will want to consider these options but keep in mind a surgeon’s experience remains one of the most important factors. Certain surgical techniques and technologies have steep learning curves for surgeons. An experienced surgeon who uses a traditional surgical approach may offer better outcomes than a less experienced surgeon who is using the latest technology and methods.

See Choosing a Surgeon for Total Knee Replacement

Outpatient (Same Day) Knee Replacement

People who undergo outpatient knee replacement are discharged the same day they have surgery. Some evidence suggest that outpatient knee replacement surgery saves money and offers the same or better results for eligible patients, though more study is needed.9

See The Advantages and Disadvantages of Outpatient Knee Replacement

Outpatient knee replacement is relatively uncommon. Many patients have other conditions, such as heart disease, that justify one or more nights of post-surgical observation at the hospital.10 In addition, many surgeons and patients simply prefer at least one night of post-surgical observation.

See Who Can Have Outpatient Knee Replacement?

References:

  1. Picard F, Deakin A, Balasubramanian N, Gregori A. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2018;28(5):781-791. doi:10.1007/s00590-018-2164-4.
  2. Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:77–81.
  3. Gandhi R, Smith H, Lefaivre KA, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Complications after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty as compared with traditional incision techniques: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(1):29–35.

Complete Listing of References

Pages:
  • 1
  • 2